亚伦·莱维，企业文件共享和存储厂商直言不讳的创始人兼CEO框，预见的时候，所有的企业数据将前往云，和他的公司本周推出了扩展能力，速度过渡。
莱维跟足球竞猜app软件该公司的有关其区域和加速器项目，并讨论初创企业，公共云的行军消息，本周未来，甚至他过去的工作作为一个专业的魔术师。
至于区，这些让客户盒指定地理区域为存储在他们的数据，帮助他们通过法律这一任务的某些信息存储生成合规性问题应对。开始与德国，爱尔兰，新加坡，日本，以及项目今天的公告说，澳大利亚和加拿大的旁边。（澳大利亚服务应该是在今年的第三季度上市，与加方在第四季度跟进。）莱维说，这使得Box在其细分市场的“最具全球性的”解决方案。
更多：19个免费云存储选项
该公司还宣布了一项更新箱加速器，它的工作原理是减少公共互联网的数据必须采取的“跳”的数量。
下面是莱维不得不说一下区，加速器，还有更多：
有些公司仍然将他们的数据居住在公有云的理念性 - 你如何解决他们的问题？
What happens is, that resistance or perceived fear comes from the fact that, when you move to the cloud, it often feels like you’re giving up some kind of control or some kind of security or some kind of value proposition that you had in the on-premise world.
Our belief from day 1 was you’re never going to convert people to the cloud if they don’t either match the level of security and control they get in their on-premises environment or, more importantly, exceed that level of control and security. So if you look at the innovation that we’ve been driving over the past couple of years, it’s all been about actually exceeding what you could do in your on-premises environment.
样箱区的事往往会超过单个企业能够做自己的东西。我们有经营规模，以能去合作伙伴，许多公共云供应商能够在上百个不同国家的提供云居留权。这是作战能力的水平，我们有这将是非常难以复制的单一企业。
我们整个的使命是要匹配或击败任何控制或您在部署系统具有潜在的治理与合规能力，而这正是Zones是能够提供。
那么，你认为我们最终会得到一个点，所有的企业数据是住在云计算？
我们是一点点，有时疯狂，但是这是从根本上我们的信念。而其中的原因是，我们相信，我们与您联系的一种创新的，你可以在云中，这将是从根本不可能在本地环境做做逃逸速度。...
The reason we care deeply about the cloud environment is not because we’re particularly religious about the cloud, it’s that to deliver the innovation that we need to give to our customers, and the speed of innovation, so far that’s only technically possible in the cloud. And that’s why we’re very, very dogmatic about this delivery model and making sure we’re driving as much innovation as possible for our customers.
所以不是宗教，而是教条。
是的，如果有两者之间的区别。
Dropbox的已使得其企业的推销改进，它的重新platformed出售给企业 - 你怎么看待他们的竞争对手，这些天？
我们看到他们在SMB空间不少，就像我们看到谷歌或微软在市场上也是如此。
一旦你开始看大型企业 - 所以公司拥有数千或更多的员工 - 这是我们所定义的行业，和Gartner刚刚入选我们的...安全文件共享和协作领域最有远见的供应商提供的市场，而我们are continuing to advance our enterprise footprint, our enterprise technology, our enterprise partnerships, to ensure that we’re delivering as much value and differentiation as possible.
To that end, we primarily see Microsoft when it comes to competition in large enterprises, we very rarely see Dropbox, but of course we are always keeping track of what’s going on in the competitive market and we don’t want to slow down and all.
您如何看待公共IaaS的像AWS和Azure和谷歌的增长？那是给你们的，长期的威胁，或者这是否燕尾？
它很好地吻合 - 我们不能够提供箱区，如果不是公共IaaS提供商的快速扩张。因此，我们大约三年前，在这里我们不得不要么去和全球范围内建立自己的基础设施......做了一个决定，[但]我们做了我们的基本技术，从底层存储的应用程序决定重新设计。
通过这样做，[这]给了我们不同的公共云提供商连接起来，能够将数据存储在我们的选择还是我们的客户选择的区域的能力。So in fact, the more competition there is in the public IaaS space, whether it’s IBM, Amazon, Azure, Google Cloud all competing for more regions, better performance, lower prices, all of those factors mean that our customers are going to get an even better solution when they go with Box.
We’ve built the technology that works across all these different vendors, and we have no particular requirement other than you have to have a high-performing cloud service that we can connect to, and so we’re able to benefit from all that competition and all that innovation in the public cloud space.
你看到企业文件同步和共享与像企业协作相关的应用程序合并？
There are parts that make sense, but it’s interesting – collaboration is this gray area, because one could argue that Slack is collaboration, and another could argue that EFSS [enterprise file sync and sharing] is collaboration, and then another could argue that WebEx is collaboration. And yet those are three very distinct markets.
I don’t think it makes sense to compare Box to WebEx or Slack, but we all share the same purpose, which is that we want to make it so people can do their best work wherever they’re located or with whomever they’re working. So basically, I don’t think it would make sense to have a sort of uber-collaboration market. However, the piece that I do think it makes sense to combine with is content management and EFSS.
We’re firm believers that in the future, the enterprise is not going to want to have lots of different data silos in their organizations – they’re going to want to make sure that Slack and Docusign and WebEx and Office 365 works with the same data set that people can use when people are accessing files on their iPhone or accessing data on their iPad, or being able to work from their computer. So what that means is that you’re actually going to want a platform that helps enterprises manage their content, so this is why we fundamentally are building out a content platform, not an EFSS solution.
你认为我们是在一个高科技风险投资泡沫？如果是这样，当是它会如何收场？
任何时候，任何人的以往任何时候都认为，他们已经被证明是错误...
除了那一次......
是啊，除了那一次，当他们非常，非常正确。我会说这不是我们认为，当我们想到的那种泡沫的“泡沫”。因此，这不是严重的90年代末或2000年初，仅仅是因为一对夫妇的事情发生，是非常不同的。
首先，市场上尺寸技术是幅度比15年前更大的订单。我觉得数字是像50到100亿人在互联网上的最后一个主要的科技股泡沫 - 今天，有2到3十亿人在互联网上。所以，你有一个20至30〜40倍的市场规模技术。
你也有技术字面上影响每一个行业 - 它曾经在上世纪90年代，电子商务也许媒体或只是东西还是在科技和信息空间。今天，你可以运输，生命科学，医疗保健，金融服务后去的，所以没有到技术都可以产生影响，这意味着两件事情是有限的。其中之一是，你可以有更多的方式破坏，这是对VC模式幸存，但你也可以有财务结果的更加多样化，投资者可以体验。
我们不会预测，GM会做一个数十亿美元的技术引进三，四年前，但他们买克鲁斯[自动化，这是一个非常小的启动，所以你现在有很多方法，该退出就可以开始occur, which means that there’s a lot more demand for startups and driving capital into the system. So I don’t think we’re going to see a massive pullback, we’re just going to see maybe lower valuations than we had seen in the past year or two years.
最后，我看到了这个帖子在Twitter- 你是一个生日聚会魔术师？
这实际上是一个保守的，我不想过分夸大我的魔法师经验。......这不仅是生日派对，这是企业活动和成人礼，所以各种各样的功能。